Sam Altman emails Elon Musk
Welcome to Internal Tech Emails: internal tech industry emails that surface in public records. 🔍 If you haven’t signed up, join 37,000+ others and get the newsletter:
Internal Tech Emails is brought to you by… PostHog
Product for Engineers is PostHog’s newsletter dedicated to helping you improve your product skills.
Subscribe for free to join 10,000+ engineers getting battle-tested advice on building great products, lessons (and mistakes) from building PostHog, and deep dives into the strategies of top startups.
Sam Altman emails Elon Musk
On Jun 24, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Sam Altman wrote:
1) The mission would be to create the first general Al and use it for individual empowerment—ie, the distributed version of the future that seems the safest. More generally, safety should be a first-class requirement.
2) I think we'd ideally start with a group of 7-10 people, and plan to expand from there. We have a nice extra building in Mountain View they can have.
3) I think for a governance structure, we should start with 5 people and l'd propose you, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and me. The technology would be owned by the foundation and used "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide. The researchers would have significant financial upside but it would be uncorrelated to what they build, which should eliminate some of the conflict (we'll pay them a competitive salary and give them YC equity for the upside). We'd have an ongoing conversation about what work should be open-sourced and what shouldn't. At some point we'd get someone to run the team, but he/she probably shouldn't be on the governance board.
4) Will you be involved somehow in addition to just governance? I think that would be really helpful for getting work pointed in the right direction getting the best people to be part of it. Ideally you'd come by and talk to them about progress once a month or whatever. We generically call people involved in some limited way in YC "part-time partners" (we do that with Peter Thiel for example, though at this point he's very involved) but we could call it whatever you want. Even if you can't really spend time on it but can be publicly supportive, that would still probably be really helpful for recruiting.
5) I think the right plan with the regulation letter is to wait for this to get going and then I can just release it with a message like "now that we are doing this, l've been thinking a lot about what sort of constraints the world needs for safefy." I'm happy to leave you off as a signatory. I also suspect that after it's out more people will be willing to get behind it.
Sam
From: Elon Musk
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:06 PM
To: Sam Altman
Subject: Re: AI lab
Agree on all
[This document is from Elon Musk v. Samuel Altman, et al. (2024).]
Twitter link
Threads link
Further context from Adam Satariano, Cade Metz and Tripp Mickle for The New York Times:
Mr. Musk sued OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman, accusing them of breaching a contract by putting profits and commercial interests in developing artificial intelligence ahead of the public good. A multibillion-dollar partnership that OpenAI developed with Microsoft, Mr. Musk said, represented an abandonment of a founding pledge to carefully develop A.I. and make the technology publicly available.
“OpenAI has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company, Microsoft,” said the lawsuit filed Thursday in Superior Court in San Francisco.
Further reading from Matt Levine for Bloomberg: OpenAI Isn’t Open Enough for Elon
Sponsor the Internal Tech Emails newsletter, and reach a curious and influential audience of 37,000+ tech founders, investors, operators, and enthusiasts. We’re booked for the first half of 2024, but sign up to hear about future openings. 🔍
Thanks for reading!
-Internal Tech Emails